EDITORIAL BOARD:
Gloria Emeagwali
Chief Editor emeagwali@ccsu.edu
Walton Brown-Foster
Copy Editor
brownw@ccsu.edu
Haines Brown
Adviser
brownh@hartford-hwp.com
REGIONAL EDITORS:
Olayemi Akinwumi
(Nigeria)
Zenebworke Bissrat
(Ethiopia)
Paulus Gerdes
(Mozambique)
Mosebjane Malatsi
(South Africa)
Alfred Zack-Williams
(Sierra Leone)
TECHNICAL ADVISORS:
Tennyson Darko
Asst. Dir. ITS, CCSU
darko@ccsu.edu
Peter K. LeMaire
Professor, CCSU
lemaire@ccsu.edu
Bernice A. LeMaire
Website Designer
lemaire_bea@ccsu.edu
Maintained by
poku_naa@ccsu.edu
For more information
concerning AfricaUpdate
Contact:
Prof. Gloria Emeagwali
CCSU History Dept.
1615 Stanley Street
New Britain, CT 06050
Tel: 860-832-2815
emeagwali@ccsu.edu
|
|
|
|
Editorial: The Fourth Annual AMISTAD Lecture
by Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
The Inaugural Lecture in the
AMISTAD Distinguished Lecture Series was given by Professor Tunde
Zack-Williams of Central Lancashire University, United Kingdom.
Attorney Toun Ilumoka, then a Visiting Scholar at the Africana
Center delivered the Second Distinguished Lecture with a focus on
Human Rights and the Law, making reference to her vast experience as
an attorney. The Third Annual Distinguished Lecture was delivered by
Dr. Amii Omara-Otunni, the UNESCO Chair Holder in Human Rights at
the University of Connecticut at Storrs.
We are pleased to say that our Fourth Distinguished Scholar and
Recipient of this year’s AMISTAD AWARD is no lesser than the
Distinguished Toyin Falola, the Holder of the Frances Higginbotham
Nalle Centennial Chair at the University of Texas at Austin.
Dr. Toyin Falola was chosen for this distinguished lecture because
of his outstanding academic record. Dr. Falola has authored about
one hundred book reviews and seventy journal articles. He has
co-edited, co-authored and authored about 70 books. He is also a
poet.
Dr. Falola reflects on the AMISTAD episode in terms of hegemony,
subjugation and power, and the various liberation struggles and
responses fought by numerous peoples to reclaim their own past and
empower themselves. He reflects on the colonization of Africa by the
end of the 19th century and the current forces of global domination,
in the course of discussion.
We are honored to devote this issue of Africa Update to the
Distinguished Professor. We have included a selected list of his
publications in this issue. His book reviews are not included.
Dr. Gloria Emeagwali
Chief Editor, Africa Update Return to Table of
Contents
THE AMISTAD'S LEGACY: REFLECTIONS ON THE SPACES OF
COLONIZATION
Fourth Annual Distinguised AMISTAD Lecture,
Central Connecticut State University
Professor Toyin Falola
I want to use as my starting point a
great episode in the history of slave resistance, the 1839 mutiny now
known as the Amistad, which gave its name to the distinguished Amistad
Committee that invited me as a speaker. I wish to talk about how a
moment transited into a permanent historical symbol and a template to
understand race relations over time. The story is already well known,
and there is no need to present its essential details all over. On board
the Amistad slave ship on the high seas traveling toward the Northeast
coast of America (from Havana to Guanaja), Joseph Cinque organized a
bloody revolt against the Spanish crew. The hope of the temporarily
liberated slaves was that the Amistad would be forced to sail back in
the direction of Africa. The Africans had no detailed knowledge of ship
steering and probably had to rely on one of the slave dealers, Montes,
who bought them. Perhaps, Montes engaged in a deliberate trick: during
the day he steered the ship toward the east, and at night toward the
United States. Or perhaps, the liberated Africans were unable to know
how to steer back to Africa. Subsequently, the ship was intercepted by
the U.S. Navy who brought it to shore on Long Island, New York. The
Amistad and the Africans were then taken to New London, Connecticut. A
judicial hearing was announced in August 1839 while the Africans were
put in a jail in New Haven. A trial ensued, with all kinds of drama,
between nations and individuals in support of or against slavery. The
legal issues were over the rights to the cargo—Spain or the United
States?—and the status of the people—were they slaves or not? The
Amistad episode energized the abolitionists who were able to enlist the
services of a famous lawyer, John Quincy Adams, a former US president. A
successful case of slave revolt galvanized the abolitionist movement,
inserted itself into the American judicial system, and ended in freedom
for the slaves.
In September 1839, the initial case, described as criminal, was
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In the following month, Professor
Josiah Gibbs was able to locate an interpreter (James Covey) who was
able to speak with the Africans, teach them English and introduce them
to Christianity. Cinque and others turned the table, filing cases
against Monte and his fellow slave dealer for false imprisonment and
assault. The trial began in January 1840 and the District Court judge
ruled that the Africans should be turned over to the President who
should return them to Africa. An appeal followed in September 1840, but
the Circuit Court upheld the decision of the lower court. The government
took the case to the Supreme Court where John Quincy Adams and Roger
Baldwin argued their cases. In March 1841, the Supreme Court ordered
that the Africans should be freed immediately. Between March and
November, the freed Africans learned more English and Christian
education. In November 1841, they left for Africa as part of a
missionary group. They arrived in Sierra Leone in January 1842 where
they began evangelization work. Some left the mission. In 1879, Cinque
died and was buried in a cemetery dedicated to American missionaries.
My purpose is not to revisit the narrative, but to comment on what the
episode represents to Africans and people of African descent. The
Amistad episode provides us with the opportunity to examine issues
around slavery, race and power, domination and memory, conquest and
nationalism. I will limit my discussion to three broad interrelated
themes:
i) the manipulation of historical memory for politics, and resistance by
slaves to question or reinvent that memory;
ii) the transition from the control of people to the conquest of land;
and
iii) finally, the response by dominated people to reclaim their own past
and struggle for inclusion.
The Amistad revolt, as well as the events before and after it reveal the
difficulties faced by black people to make their own histories in ways
favorable to them. The conquest of Africa and the consequent disapora
created by Western forces was cultural, political, and economic. This
conquest, in its multi-faceted forms, is the colonization of the spaces
created by the African world. The interpretation of the conquest has
equally entailed the colonization of a people’s memory.
The Colonization of Memory
In spite of the short narrative just presented, attempts have been made
to erase the memory of the Amistad episode and related ones. For a long
time, the standard narrative was that slaves accepted their conditions
for four hundred years, and that many were even unhappy with the
abolition and emancipation of the nineteenth century. Those who captured
and used slaves were quick to write stories about slavery. In so doing,
they sought to colonize the memory regarding slavery. There were three
clever flanks, sometimes repackaged even today. The first is the
fundamental attempt to justify slavery in religious, ideological and
racial terms. Motives can be disguised, putting the economic
circumstances under the carpet and so-called humanitarian ideas on the
table. Second, there is the flawed thesis that in the long run
conditions of slavery were better than conditions of underdevelopment.
Indeed, not a few blacks have even expressed the self-hating opinion
that they were better off having been shipped out of Africa. Third, and
arguably the most persistent, a clever intellectual game to treat the
slave trade as a blame game, presenting a balance sheet between those
who demanded and those who supplied. In this balance sheet presentation,
the Africans who stayed on their continent and were forced to respond to
a demand-side economy were given an equal share of blame. Those who have
fallen to this balance sheet argument have been cleverly led to another
problem: an attempt to divide blacks into antagonistic blocs, so that
tensions can emerge between African Americans and continental Africans.
What also emerged from the colonization of the African space after 1885
was the clever attempt to colonize the African minds. The image of
Africans as docile, eager to take punishment, and confident in bondage
since there was no better alternative for them has deep roots. The
presentation of Africans as passive and collaborators into the slave
trade is also widespread in dominant circles, even up till today, simply
to transfer the blame from the activities of the hegemonic elite to the
victims of economic and political brutalities.
Western education, for a long time, became the tool of colonization.
Consciousness of race inferiority was accepted and internalized by many
blacks. W. E. B. Du Bois spoke about double consciousness, defined as
“this sense of always looking at one’s self through the eyes of others,
of measuring one’s soul by the tape of the world that looks on in amused
contempt and pity.” In his well cited book, Carter Woodson spoke
eloquently about what he called the “mis-education of the negro”:
…the negro’s mind has been brought under the control of his oppressor.
The problem of holding the negro down, therefore, is easily solved. When
you control a man’s thinking, you do not have to worry about his
actions. You do not have to tell him not to stand here or go yonder. He
will find his “proper place” and will stay in it. You do not need to
send him to the back door. He will go without being told. In fact, if
there is no back door, he will cut one for his special benefit. His
education makes it necessary.
It took a while for new knowledge to replace decadent ones. Indeed, it
was not until after the Second World War that the study of Africa
received legitimacy in the majority of Western academic institutions.
The colonization of memory is based on the assumption that knowledge
about events such as the Amistad, slavery, and imperialist domination
can either be erased, where possible, or told from the point of view of
the slave owners and conquerors. There is also the assumption that
ignorance about the enslaved can be manufactured. The power of
domination is turned into the power to construct memory. It is also the
power to create silences when it was politically expedient to do so. The
majority of Africans growing up in colonial Africa would never have been
taught the history of slave resistance, talk less of hearing about the
Amistad. Until the European power was about to end, there was no such
academic project as the systematic study of Africa and its diaspora.
African students were told that they had no history, and they did not
make any significant contributions to world civilization.
The denial of a people’s past is not that a past did not exist—there are
no such peoples without a past—but a statement about power and the uses
to which it has been put. When millions of people were enslaved and when
their continent was forcefully conquered, it was a strategy both of
justification and domination to deny the people a past, a memory. The
maintenance of power also meant the creation of a new history to erase
the previous. The new history is of how domination has enabled the
enslaved to benefit from their being in chains and how conquest has
rewarded the colonized. Blacks were regarded as “the white man’s
burden”: to prevent their extinction, they needed to be saved. To be
saved, they needed to be civilized. To be civilized, they needed to be
enslaved and conquered.
The colonization of memory is also based on the assumption that the
colonizer was an effective teacher. The colonizer had become the ideal
citizen, even in foreign lands. The colonized had been transformed into
subjects, in their own spaces, and their land a big classroom. Did not a
notable British geographer, James MacQueen, arrogantly proclaim, “If we
really wish to do good in Africa, we must teach her savage sons that
white men are their superiors”? He did. Policies followed that assumed
the superiority of the slave masters and colonial officers, and the
inferiority of blacks. Inferiors could not make claims to any credible
knowledge. Their knowledge had to be colonized to teach them. The
sources that sustained their epistemologies—orality, performances, arts,
etc—were delegitimized. They were told that to talk about the past, one
needed written sources, not songs, not verbal slave narratives, not even
the residues of their environments that yield tremendous evidence.
Egypt, Nubia and Ethiopia were grudgingly excluded, since they had
written evidence of history, but the forces of change, the evidence of
the past were connected to a meta-narrative that excluded Black people
as achievers and inventors. Even Hamites—a mythical horde of migrants
from outside the continent—were invented as the creators of
civilizations. Hamites were presented as Caucasians who joined other
light-skinned people to create African civilization.
The colonization of memory has been clever in assaulting worldviews and
religions. Many Christian missionaries aligned their views with those of
slavery and imperialism. Turning themselves into agents to spread
civilization, they were aggressive in their condemnation of indigenous
worldviews, in despising indigenous religions, mislabeled as paganism.
They ranged much wider in their criticisms, carefully primitivizing
indigenous creative endeavors in music, art, religions, languages, and
cuisines. Attires were redefined as costumes, nations converted into
“tribes,” and legitimate state-building wars into political anarchies.
The violence of conquest was sanitized into legitimate wars of
civilization; the violence of resistance was presented as the activities
of barbarians and cannibals.
The Amistad reveals notions of memory. Slaves were acquired from a
position of power in terms of the technology to cross the sea, the
manufacture of guns and gunpowder to generate the violence that produced
the slaves, and the plantations where the slaves worked to produce
sugar, tobacco, cotton and other products. The perception of slaves by
their owners was framed in the context of unequal power relations.
Similarly, the resistors were trying to overcome their powerlessness.
Slave masters, in relations with their slaves, were using negative and
limited knowledge about the uprooted men and women. Slaves were being
looked upon not only as people in bondage but as the representatives of
primitive people. Racism and evolutionism combined to generate
stereotypes about black people in general. In the evolutionary tree,
created by the Western idea of civilization, the most superior culture
was Western and white. Others might be able to progress toward the
ideals of this superiority. The black race was considered to be at the
lowest stage of evolution, basically children who needed time to become
adults. Slaves were people with human anatomical features, but they were
marked apart by race and evolution. Cultural evolutionism evolved partly
out of slavery, and was reinforced by colonization and perpetuated by
stereotypes. In this colonization of memory and experience, imagination
ran wild, too wild. The most positive image of the African would be that
of a “different person,” but never superior to anyone, only better
behaved or exhibiting greater intelligence than other blacks. Rural
lifestyles and the simplicity of slaves were seen as reminders of how
the world used to be before progress came to the West. Universalism was
invented from a premise of arrogance that one group knows and
understands the truth, the only truth, which others must accept. Blacks
had to be invited to learn the truth, to move away from isolationism
toward universalism. This is a form of control in which the claim of one
truth becomes a strategy of domination, actually of total domination in
the physical as well as epistemological sense.
The presentation of the Amistad resistors and of slaves in general have
framed the meanings of Africa to Americans. They are meanings that show
not the limitation of knowledge but the deliberate creation of false
images, fake memories. If Africa does not denote “tribes” and natives,
it can mean the land of savages and cannibals. By extension, blacks are
poor, ignorant, erotic and wild. A stereotypical canvass is painted: an
exotic set of people living in primitive huts in the company of wild
animals in the jungle. Language comes out of imagination, feeding ideas
that are perpetually negative, and supplying images of barbarism to
entertain television audiences. Racism and exploitation have always
coupled, very well accepted in the United States and elsewhere in the
Western world. For many years, the United States established a
successful slavery and segregation system. Slavery and racism were
practiced in a combination that ensured exploitation. In the years after
the abolition of slavery, racist views persisted in one way or another.
Today, we find them in private discussions, exotic presentations, and
the display of cultural arrogance. The common themes of Africa remain
about animals, the jungle, and the primitive people who live there just
to show that Africans are deprived and depraved.
The era of the Amistad saw the clearly reinforced invention of Western
images of Africa. The slave trade era redefined racial and political
relations. From the eighteenth century onward, race and culture were
united in the Western construction of Africa. A monogenist view of a
world created by Adam and Eve gave way to a polygenist one in which God
created separate races and gave power to one to control others.
The Amistad enables us to question the colonization of memory. The
Amistad episode tells us about the fierceness of struggles for liberty
and freedom. Moreover, we see hints and evidence of the value of
heritage, the affirmation of culture, and the defense of humanity.
Consider the importance of the slaves involved in the Amistad to
formulate an identity of resistance in the middle passage. The struggles
they produced led to a powerful representation beyond the symbolic—the
representation of resistance as freedom and as politics, and of the
culture of rebellion engrained in the experience of slavery itself.
Scholars have produced counter narratives to demonstrate the misleading
nature of the colonization of memory. Today, we have a long list of
works on resistance to slavery that document various episodes and
tendencies. Such studies demonstrate the failure of the attempts to
silence or kill the slave narratives of resistance. On the African side,
limited documented evidence shows the examples of people who tried to
prevent the slave trade, such as the activities of Queen Nzinga of the
Matamba in Angola who, from 1630 to 1648, fought the Portuguese from
taking African slaves. In Dahomey, King Agaja Trudo attempted to end
slavery between 1724 and 1726. The pressure on the demand side made
these attempts so feeble. Within Africa, the project of slave making was
a project of violence made possible with imported guns and gunpowder. In
the brutal Middle Passage, slaves had to be overwhelmed and shackled to
prevent their jumping to the sea and killing themselves. The routine of
individual experiences in the Middle Passage are not necessarily
captured in the historical records. The Amistad was a revolt on a slave
ship, one that we know the best because of its prominence in the
American legal historical records on slavery. But there were others as
well. In 1730, 96 African slaves from the Guinea Coast staged a mutiny
on board the Little George. They successfully confined the crew to the
ship’s cabinet, reversed the direction of the ship to the Sierra Leone
River, abandoned the ship and jumped inland as free citizens. There was
another case in 1740, in the same region, when a mutiny occurred on the
Jolly Bachelor sailing on the Sierra Leone River. The Jolly Bachelor was
attacked by free Africans who set the slaves free. Alexander
Falconbridge, who had first-hand experience of the Middle Passage,
recorded in his book that the spirit and aspirations that shaped the
minds of the fighters in the Amistad was actually very common.
As very few of the Negroes can so far brook the loss of their liberty
and the hardships they endure, they are ever on the watch to take
advantage of the least negligence in their oppressors. Insurrections are
frequently the consequence; which are seldom expressed without much
bloodshed. Sometimes these are successful and the whole ship's company
is cut off. They are likewise always ready to seize every opportunity
for committing some acts of desperation to free themselves from their
miserable state and notwithstanding the restraints which are laid, they
often succeed.
Resistance in plantation economies was common. Those with the ability to
read and write, and with the opportunity to put their ideas in print,
composed slave narratives which have survived till today. Slavery was
not simply about domination, as the narratives by slave owners tend to
present it, but equally about resistance, as the activities of slaves do
clearly show.
Slave owners attempted to control the memory of slavery. Many of their
successors have equally attempted to appropriate the knowledge of
slavery. In this appropriation, there is a deliberate attempt to
minimize the evils of slavery by blaming Africans for selling their own
citizens, by making the demand-side economy less significant than the
bread basket. The continuity of poverty, in repackaged slavery
conditions, is blamed on the poor—alas! if only they can work harder! We
have to reclaim the knowledge of slavery and of poverty in order to put
events and actions in their proper context.
The Colonization of Spaces
The events that surrounded the Amistad were about the control of people.
Around the same time, the control of space, manifested as colonization
and direct occupation, was about to commence. The Atlantic slave trade
was moving to an end in the nineteenth century, but the forced movement
of people from Africa was about to give way to a project of control of
the entire continent and its people. Race was a key sponsor of
colonization. Racist theories of the nineteenth century constructed
black people as inferior, a race that could be destined for extinction.
A number of studies conducted by pseudo scientists (e.g., John Burgess)
provided a so-called conclusion on black inferiority. With its enormous
ability to conquer others, Europe was confident about itself, its
civilization, its superiority. They celebrated the Industrial
revolution, the progress in science, the Enlightenment, and their
ability to travel world wide. They used their own evidence to construct
an arrogance of culture that saw others, notably Africans, as far below
them. This was not the time to talk about the equality of races or of
humanity, but of racial domination. A combination of politicians and
businessmen saw the wealth that could come from Africa. Their vision was
one of domination and maximum expropriation, not collaboration, and
their ideas began to spread. The colonization of the black space was a
global project, the domination of Africa by Western forces, technology
and culture. The title of the famous poem by Rudyard Kipling, “The White
Man’s Burden,” captures it all. The contents reveal a grandiose desire
of greed:
Take up the White Man’s burden—
Send forth the best ye breed—
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness,
On fluttered folk and wild—
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.
Take the White Man’s burden—
Ye dare not stoop to less—
Nor call too loud on Freedom
To cloak your weariness;
By all ye cry or whisper,
By all ye leave or do,
The silent, sullen peoples
Shall weigh your Gods and you.
Kipling gave us the clues. God and whiteness were constructed by Kipling
as allies to control others. These others were subordinate and
child-like. The subordination required the colonization of space
indefinitely because the transformation of the “half-devil and
half-child” was a never-ending job.
The creation of the European empire in Africa after 1885 was the
colonization of African space. Africa became an extension of Europe.
Colonial knowledge reflected this reality: the evidence of change,
according to the colonizers, was produced by the colonization of space.
The colonization of space, in combination with the trans-Atlantic slave
trade, led to the invention of Africa as the “Dark Continent” during the
nineteenth century. It was during that century, all to justify the
violent conquest of Africa, that the continent became presented as a
place of strange customs: cannibalism, ritual murder, and warfare. The
propaganda in Europe, to support the military invasions of other lands,
was that Europeans were dealing with people without civilizations: they
presented to their own public stories of Africans still grappling to
learn languages, arts and crafts. Nineteenth century science and
philosophy were also propagating evidence of racial differences to
explain human diversity. In 1859, Charles Darwin published his The
Origin of Species which showed how different species evolved in relation
to biology and environment, a conclusion which was racialized by various
interpreters to mean that there was one race at the top of the
hierarchy. Whites were on the top, followed by Asians, and then followed
the inferior races—Africans, Native Americans, and Australian
Aborigines.
The colonization of Africa became so easy to justify in this
circumstance. Conversion—the introduction of Western ideas to civilize
Africans—became even a secondary point. Africans were said to be too far
behind to be easily uplifted. Rather, what the “Dark Continent” needed
was a trusteeship—as inferiors, characterized as the lowest form of
humanity, they should be taken care of as babies. The colonizers did not
see evidence of achievements, but of savagery and barbarism. Africans
needed conquest, as a form of assistance. Scientific race theory now
combined with imperialism to bring about the end of Africa’s sovereignty
from which it is yet to recover.
The colonization of space, like the colonization of memory, was based on
lies—not ignorance, as many prefer to say, but absolute deliberate
untruth. To start with, there was no foundation for their historical
claims about the continent in relation to the European concept of
progress and civilization. Second, the conquerors described African
nations as violent, but they conquered the place with violence. Their
rule also unleashed violence that subsequently became part of a
political culture. Africans were drawn into two World Wars whose
objectives did not concern them. Third, in the conversion of Africans to
Christianity, they used a rather strange concept of love—God appointed
Europeans as prophets and saviors—which hid the cultural damage
inflicted upon them. Christianity became a gift. Former slave holders
and plantation owners were now condemning Africans for slavery. The
trans-Atlantic slave trade lingered till the mid-nineteenth century, but
the receivers of the slaves were now the ones to control the moral
agenda.
The colonization of space opened up the avenues for the exploitation of
people. Irrespective of the system of colonial governance, be it a
policy of indirect rule, assimilation, association, paternalism and
various other categories of colonial relation, the objective was clearly
the same: exploitation. A colonial dictatorship emerged, with white
officers on top, protected by the army and police. Africans paid taxes
to finance the administration, while they produced crops and minerals
that were shipped abroad. Established precolonial nations and their
political structures were swept aside. Changes occurred in all aspects
of African life, producing anomie, confusion, and fractured modernity,
some of which has been captured in many literary and academic works. The
combination of slavery and colonialism laid the foundation of Africa’s
underdevelopment.
Counter- Colonization Projects
Nationalism produced numerous forms of anti-colonial resistance,
including violent ones. Indeed, the fall of the European empire in
Africa was made possible by the ability of Africans to make the
enterprise unworkable. Similarly in the Americas, the emancipation of
slaves led to various demands for inclusion in political and democratic
spaces. The demands unleashed various struggles up until the twentieth
century, most notably the civil rights movement. Various forms of
nationalist projects have survived till today.
Black people began to construct alternative forms of knowledge to
counter the experience of domination. Western-oriented universities
emerged in different parts of Africa from the 1940s onward. A new
generation of Africans acquired degrees and began to teach and hold
positions of influence. In the United States, Black studies programs
also emerged. As blacks contributed to scholarship, images of a lost
past were recreated, narratives shifted from colonial condemnation to
objective historical realities. New sources and methodologies produced
new and rich histories. Non-written epistemologies emerged to describe
the tragedies of the slave trade and the colonial encounters. When black
people began to write, we see clearly the pain and anguish in the slave
narratives. By the time we enter the twentieth century, academic
writings developed as counter discourses. In Africa, nationalist
historiographies developed to present Africa-centered histories. Cheikh
Anta Diop became famous, supplying ideas that led to the creation of the
Afrocentric movement in the United States, popularized by Molefi Asante
of Temple University. Black Studies were created in the American academy
against opposition, some even confronting violence in the 1960s. African
nationalist historiography successfully provided rich evidence on the
African past, pointing to established institutions and structures. The
contributions of Africa to other cultures have equally been
acknowledged, while debate continues as to what the Greeks owed to
Africans.
Activist scholarship created new approaches, some non-western in their
orientation and some adopting the methodologies of so-called mainstream
departments. The agenda of Black Studies is anti-colonization. Combining
intellectual with practical projects, Black Studies concentrates on the
investigation of and the methods to end the oppression and exploitation
of black people. Race and racialization should not just be seen as an
epiphenomenal, as many social sciences discipline tend to emphasize.
Conceived as a distinct discipline, Black Studies is not shy of action
and rhetoric, and it’s clear about its investigation of the past,
present and future of black people to make various political and
anti-colonization statements and demands.
The knowledge of counter colonization dismisses the so-called neutrality
of Cartesian, Western models of knowing. Black Studies contested the
claim to historical objectivity by those in power, while it maintains
that race, class and gender must be at the center of historical and
cultural presentations. As Black Studies attains its maturation, its
emphases attain greater clarity: at the center of its epistemology is
the promotion of an African ethos. Various writings fall on the
structure of black communities and the language of liberation to address
the omission of the black experience in the academy.
While the premise of Black Studies has been accepted in various
quarters, its creation is a process of struggles against the
colonization of memory and the colonization of spaces. In Africa,
African Studies was born in the era of decolonization in the 1940s and
1950s when scholarship was created by the political nationalism that saw
the end of the European empire. In the United States, Black Studies
struggled for inclusion in the universities as part of the Black Power
and civil rights movement. From the mid-1950s to the mid-1970s, it
created its form and content. It presented itself as innovative, a
challenge to racism, and a methodology to understand the people of
African descent. Moreover, many argued that Black Studies would provide
a space for black students on campuses to learn about their history and
interact with people of their race and ethnicity.
The creation of Black studies was part of the general package of
knowledge connected with political emancipation. Various anti-hegemonic
discourses grew in the non-academic setting as well. As far back as the
nineteenth century, Frederick Douglas and other abolitionists had called
for the creation of new knowledge that would refuse to accept the racist
view that blacks were inferior to whites. Douglas was blessed with able
successors, notables such as Du Bois, Alexander Crumwell, Carter Woodson
who founded the Journal of Negro History, and Arthur Schumberg, all of
whom supported the idea of reclaiming black history. In the 1920s and
1930s, Negro History Week and the Harlem Renaissance paid attention to
black art, literature and culture. Scholarship was broadly defined
around the conception of blackness, an all-encompassing umbrella for
Africans and people of African descent.
During the twentieth century, many activists argued that black history
would generate racial pride among the youth and promote racial harmony.
A number of black students on campuses in Africa and the United States
said that they were not Europeans and saw no reason to study
Shakespeare, Mozart and Beethoven and that they preferred Langston
Hughes. History became a relevant discipline to construct and defend
nationalism, to repudiate the negatives about Africa, and to point to
the achievements of black people world-wide. An intellectual patrimony
of disciplines began to reinforce the ideas of cultural patrimony.
Blending oral with written sources and placing Africana at the center of
discourse serves to prevent fragmented discourses on blackness, ones
that would separate the history of slavery from European conquest or the
history of the civil rights in the United States from that of
decolonization in Africa.
The most sustained anti-colonization project has been the use of
culture—as an ideology, as a source of affirmation, as an agency of
resistance. The ideas of Negritude and the Harlem Renaissance cultural
celebrations were emphatic in stressing the cultural difference of black
people, and in calling for the use of culture for political purposes.
More importantly, culture was promoted as a critical source of identity.
The connections between culture and politics have been hugely
successful. With words, eloquent, melodramatic and combative, many
writers have reclaimed the lost glories of the past. Not only have they
revealed stories of achievements, they also demolished the archives of
Western domination. They redefined the notions and evidence of
civilization, adopting the definitions that elevate people of African
descent. They intellectually centralized Africa, projecting it as the
center of the Black world. Furthermore, the uses to which culture has
been put have created a mode of struggle against oppression. Aim�
Cesair�, Leopold Senghor and others of the Negritude and Harlem school
opened up a new library of African tradition and philosophy. They used
culture to create unity among blacks, an ideology of cultural patrimony
that sustained the politics of Pan-Africanism. Blackness was turned into
beauty, the construction of racial pride. To be black was to be proud,
drawing no references to affirmation from whiteness.
The use of culture as a tool of resistance is arguably now the most
dominant. In the United States, it has become less common to deploy
violent rhetoric, in particular since the success of the civil rights
struggles of the 1960s. The combative Black Power movement of the 1960s
has given way to a radicalized culturalist agenda of the Afrocentric
movement. In Africa, violence is still a strategy to combat unjust
power. Black-on-black violence reveals stresses and tensions among the
marginalized. Various governments deliberately opted for the use of
culture for political purposes, some to shore up authoritarian regimes
and some genuinely motivated by the need to stop the erosion of African
cultures. Festivals of old are repackaged and represented to newer
audiences, in large measure to entertain them. Technologies of
presentation, notably television and Internet, have made it much easier
to popularize culture and to spread its non-political manifestations.
The various governments, with the support of the United Nations and
UNESCO, formulated ways to preserve culture, making it illegal to take
works of antiquity out of Africa. Cultural patrimony is also regarded as
the bedrock of identity and the “self-understanding of a people.”
By and large the resort to culture has been successful in a number of
ways. It provides the most effective politicizing tool to create Black
political solidarity. Cultural patrimony provides the opportunity to
network at the level of international organizations and to build a
series of ties between and within continents. More importantly, it
allows challenges to be mounted against mis-education, to reformulate
damaged consciousness, and to assert mental autonomy as well as the
independence of personality and the assertion of collective identities.
Conclusion: The Amistad’s Legacy
An event as far back as 1839 continues to give us the opportunity to
examine issues around history, race relations, and memory. The
trans-Atlantic slave trade is dead, the European empire in Africa has
collapsed, and plantation slavery is no more. Yet, we still have the
subordination of Africans and the people of African descent to Western
global forces. What, then, is the relevance of the Amistad in today’s
circumstances?
First, we see the tensions between resistance and power. The connection
is not hard to explain. What Africa lost to the Americas and the West is
not just labor, but primarily power: the power to use its own labor and
land for its own economies; the power to shape its future and define
itself; and the power to relate to the rest of the world on its own
terms. How blacks have responded represents the politics of resistance.
Those with power have struggled to silence the past, the memory of
resistance. A celebration of the Amistad and related episodes of
resistance is necessary to prevent the colonization of memory. If power
wants to silence the past, it is our responsibility to keep the past
alive, to bring back the ghosts to talk. This is our first major task, a
rescue operation of the past. We have been successful in generating new
knowledge and questioning many older assumptions. The so-called natives,
as we can now tell, are not as dumb as the racialized images have
presented them. They can see all the lies and present their own truths.
Second, in bringing back those ghosts, we have to continue to pay
attention to the longer and larger legacy of the tradition of resistance
and rebellion. We should not use our limited resources and fragmented
intellectual power to celebrate the domination of our people by
imperialists and empire builders whose main goal is the evil
exploitation of our people. The enslavement that led to the Amistad and
the colonization of memory and the imperial conquest that led to the
colonization of spaces have been shown to be ephemeral. In resisting the
colonization of spaces, we have to pay attention to great moments and
courageous leaders, patriots and nationalists who fought in defense of
their own people. The Amistad is part of the tradition that must have a
permanent stamp on our consciousness.
Third, the Amistad is a preface to the narrative of rebellion and civil
rights, all informed by nationalism that questioned the Western model of
suppression. Black intellectuals have challenged the racist idea of
black inferiority. They have even moved further, as Du Bois did a long
time ago in The Souls of Black Folk, to reject the construction of the
world into two: the civilized and the uncivilized. Blacks cannot be at
the margins of history.
Fourth, when moments of justice and fair play arise, even if it involves
a few, they deserve the mobilization of our full support. The Amistad
trial shows the precedence in American law—gaining freedom through the
courts. Law and the judiciary do favor the power elite, but they provide
opportunities for the poor and marginalized to express their grievances.
Fifth, the judiciary and other institutions of power are not enough for
liberation. We see the limitations in the case of the Amistad. What is
necessary is the acquisition of power, the distribution of key power to
handle the negativity of the racial context. We have seen what happened
to slaves without political power. And we can see what happens to free
people without political power. The Amistad has shown us the
consequences of powerlessness. With sufficient power, there would have
been no lynching, dispossession and economic exploitation.
Sixth, the Amistad shows us the beginning of reparation and the
back-to-Africa movement. The resistors demonstrated the illegality of
slavery, and they wanted to seek compensation for their sufferings and
also return to Africa. The two issues they raised continue to resonate
today, and they assist us in framing the issues around reparation.
Similarly, the Amistad also connects us to the events and analysis
around the Middle Passage which has been turned into a distinct
sub-specialization in slavery studies. We see the struggles on the high
seas in the Middle Passage. The Middle Passage has been a connector,
bringing Africans to the Americas and Americans to Africa. Where new
identities have been formed and shaped have become the subject of
controversy, especially since the publication by Paul Gilroy of The
Black Atlantic, which has been read has an attempt to erase Africa from
the formation of African American identity. The desire by Cinque and his
colleagues to return to Africa has been manifested by many others
through permanent relocation to Sierra Leone and Liberia and till today
by way of tourism by those of the African diaspora.
Seventh, we must insert the Amistad and all major forms of resistance
into popular culture. There have been documentaries and films on the
Amistad, thus keeping the memory alive. This insertion into popular
culture and the classroom is critical to keeping the memory of
resistance alive. Popular culture must not be allowed to be part of the
spaces of colonization, but should instead occupy the spaces of
resistance and nationalism. The academy must lend its full support to
the creation of a just world where the ideology that created the Amistad
will be crushed, and where the system that produced inequities will no
longer exist.
Finally, Blacks must be able to shape economic and political processes
in order to assert themselves. Their ability to work turned them into
slaves. The usefulness of their land and their ability to produce
converted them from citizens into colonial subjects. Their ability to
work and travel make them exploitable members in a globalized economy.
It is not that blacks don’t work, which they do; it is just the kind of
work they do and who they work for that represent one source of trouble.
While we should keep pointing to earlier, blatant racist discourses and
formulations, we must also continue to specify the current
neo-imperialist forms and representations against which we have to
struggle. Discourses around aid, development, security, democracy and
others present new challenges for resistance. We have to be alert to the
dangers posed by seductive political propaganda that appeal to a sense
of wanting to do good and imagining social justice while the actual
intentions are disguised.
We have been successful in defining and using culture. However, the
forces of global domination are getting stronger and they cannot be
fully tamed by ideas drawn solely from culture. We have to create
competitive technologies and economies. The Amistad shows the dimensions
of cultures—in the longing to go back home, in the use of language,
etc—but what produced the result was action and resistance, that is the
ability to mobilize culture in the service of politics. The gap between
the West and Africa, between whites and blacks is not a gap about
cultural difference or a gap structured by cultural peculiarities but by
access to resources, inequalities in global economies, and the political
domination of one race by the other. The African slaves who were part of
the Amistad and the millions of others along with them were not forcibly
converted into slaves only because of their skin color but because there
was an unequal economy in place. The colonization of Africa was not made
possible because one group was White and the other Black, but because
one had in abundance the Gatling and Maxim guns. Racism was justified on
the grounds of political and economic interests, which is precisely how
these interests were articulated to generate profit and maintain
dominance. We have to close those crucial gaps in politics and
economies. We have to construct power to remove Blacks from the very
margins of politics itself. Self-assertion must transcend the patrimony
of culture to embrace the patrimony of entrepreneurship, clearly guided
by the patrimony of power.
THE WORKS OF PROFESSOR TOYIN FALOLA
BOOKS
2006 Traditional and Modern Health Systems in Nigeria (co-edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2006) pp. xiii + 468.
2006 Endangered Bodies: Women, Children and Health in Africa (co-edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2006) pp. xii + 291.
2005 Igbo Art and Culture and Other Essays by Simon Ottenberg (edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005,) pp. xiii + 482.
2005 Myth, History and Society: The Collected Works of Adiele Afigbo
(edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005,) pp. viii + 634.
2005 The Politics of the Global Oil Industry: An Introduction
(co-author) (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 2005), pp. xiv+ 262
2005 Orisa: Yoruba Gods and Spiritual Identity in Africa and the
Diaspora (co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005,) pp.
viii+457.
2005 Igbo History and Society: The Essays of Adiele Afigbo (edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005,) pp. ix + 651.
2005 Christianity and Social Change in Africa: Essays in Honor of J. D.
Y. Peel (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2005), pp. xix + 676.
2005 African Urban Spaces in Historical Perspective (co-edited)
(Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2005), pp. Xl+395.
2005 The Yoruba Diaspora in the Atlantic World (co-edited) (Indiana,
Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2004), pp.
xii+455.
2005 Urbanization and African Cultures (co-edited) (Durham: Carolina
Academic Press, 2005), pp. xv + 464.
2005, Nigerian History, Politics and Affairs: The Collected Essays of
Adiele Afigbo (edited) (Trenton,
NJ: Africa World Press, 2005), pp. x + 722.
2005 Dark Webs: Perspectives on Colonialism in Africa (edited) (Durham:
Carolina Academic Press, 2003), pp. ix + 486.
2005 Yoruba Creativity: Fiction, Language, Life and Songs (edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press,
2005), pp. Vi+350.
2004, Economic and Political Reforms in Nigeria, 1945-65 (Kent: State
University Press, Spring 2004), pp. Xiv+ 272.
2004 Africa in the Twentieth Century: The Adu Boahen Reader (edited)
(Trenton, N.J: Africa World Press, 2004), pp. xiii + 667.
2004 Globalization and Urbanization in Africa (coedited) (Trenton, N.J.:
Africa World Press, 2004),
pp. xii+294.
2004 Teen Life in Africa (edited) (Westport, CT.: Greenwood, 2004), pp.
333+xviii.
2004 Nigerian Cities (co-edited) (Trenton: N.J.: Africa World Press,
2004), pp. xii+ 396.
2003 The Power of African Cultures (Rochester, NY: University of
Rochester Press, 2003), pp. vii+354.
2003 Sources and Methods in African History: Spoken, Written, Unearthed
(co-edited) (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2002), pp.
xxi+ 409.
2003 Africa, Vol. 5, Africa: Contemporary Africa (edited) (Durham:
Carolina Academic Press, 2003), pp. xxxiii + 962.
2003 Pawnship, Slavery, and Colonialism in Africa (co-edited) (Trenton,
N.J.: Africa World Press,
2003), pp. vi+480.
2003 Ghana in Africa and the World: Essays in Honor of Adu Boahen
(edited) (Trenton, N.J.: Africa
World Press, 2003), pp.iv+ 800
2002 Nigeria in the Twentieth Century (edited) (Durham: Carolina
Academic Press, 2002), pp. xx+
947.
2002 Key Events in African History: A Reference Guide (Westport, Ct.:
Greenwood, 2002), pp. xxiii +347. [Runner’s Up, 2004 Conover-Porter
Award, African Studies Association]
2002 Black Business and Economic Power (Rochester, NY: Rochester
University Press, 2002 (co-edited), pp. xii+ 628.
2002 Africanizing Knowledge: African Studies Across the Disciplines
(co-edited), (New Brunswick and London: Transaction, 2002), pp. ix+447.
2002 The Challenges of History and Leadership in Africa: The Essays of
Bethwell Allan Ogot (Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press, 2002)
(co-edited), pp. lxvi +684.
2002 Africa, Vol. 4, The End of Colonial Rule: Nationalism and
Decolonization (edited) (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2002), pp. xix
+ 541.
2002 Culture and Customs of Ghana (co-author) (Westport, CT.: Greenwood,
2002), pp. xx+224
2002 Palavers of African Literature: Essays in Honor of Bernth Lindfors
Vol. (co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2002), pp. xv+399.
2002 African Writers and Their Readers: Essays in Honor of Bernth
Lindfors, Vol. II (co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2002),
pp. xvi+542.
2002 Colonial Africa, 1885-1939 (Carolina Academic Press) (edited),
Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2002, pp. xxiii+448.
2002 African Politics in Postimperial Times: The Essays of Richard L.
Sklar (edited) (Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press, 2002), pp.
Lxxxvi+755.
2001 Yoruba Warlords of the Nineteenth Century (co-author) (Trenton,
N.J.: Africa World Press, 2001), pp. xviii+301.
2001 The Culture and Customs of Nigeria (Westport, CT.: Greenwood,
2001), pp.+
2001 Nationalism and African Intellectuals (University of Rochester
Press, 2001), pp. xx+372.
2000 Africa, vol. 1: Peoples and States (edited) (Durham: Carolina
Academic
Press, 2000), pp. xvi+ 451.
2000 Africa, vol. 2: Cultures and Societies (edited) (Durham: Carolina
Academic Press, 2000), pp. xx + 332
2000 Yoruba Gurus: Indigenous Production of Knowledge in Africa
(Trenton: Africa World Press) 2000
2000 Tradition and Change in Africa: The Essays of J. F. Ade Ajayi
(edited)
(Trenton: Africa World Press)
2000 Culture, Politics and Money among the Yoruba
(Transactions/University of Rutgers) (co-author) 1999 xv + 378 pp.
1999 The History of Nigeria (Westport: Greenwood, 1999) xviii + 269 pp.
1998 Studies in the Nineteenth-Century Economic History of Nigeria
(co-edited) (Madison-
Wisconsin: African Studies Program,1998; released in early 1999).
1998 Violence in Nigeria: The Crisis of Religious Politics and Secular
Ideologies. Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 1998, + 388 pp.
1996 Religious Militancy and Self-Assertion: Islam and Politics in
Nigeria. (co-author) London: Avebury, 1996, xii+298 pp.
1996 Development Planning and Decolonization in Nigeria. Gainesville:
University Press of Florida, 1996, xxiv+215 pp.
1995 Religious Impact on the Nation State: The Nigerian Predicament.
(co-author) London: Avebury, 1995, ix + 352 pp.
1994 The Military Factor in Nigeria (co-author) New York: E. Mellen, iii
+ 238 pp.
1994 Pawnship in Africa. Debt Bondage in Historical Perspective.
(co-editor) Colorado: Westview, 1994, viii + 341 pp.
1994 Child Health in Nigeria: the Impact of a Depressed Economy
(co-editor), London: Avebury.
1993 Pioneer, Patriot and Patriarch: Samuel Johnson and the Yoruba
People. (editor) Wisconsin-Madison: African Studies Program, 1993, 197
pp.
1993 African Historiography (editor) London: Longman. ix+244 pp.
1992 Rural Development Problems in Nigeria (co editor) (London: Avebury)
xix + 183 pp.
1992 Warfare and Diplomacy In Pre-colonial Nigeria (co-edited)
(Wisconsin-Madison: African Studies Program, University of
Wisconsin-Madison) 221 pp.
1992 History of Nigeria: Nigeria in the twentieth century Vol. 3
(Longman).
1992 The Political Economy of Health in Africa. Center for International
Studies, Ohio University (co editor) (Ohio University, Athens:
Monographs in International Studies, Africa Series, No. 60) pp.xii +
254.
1991 Yoruba Historiography (Wisconsin-Madison: African Studies Program,
Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison) 214 pp.
1991 History of Nigeria, Vol. 11, Nigeria in the Nineteenth Century
(co-author; textbook) Lagos: Longman, v+226 pp.
1991 Religion and Society in Nigeria: Historical and Comparative
Perspectives. (co editor) Spectrum. (Ibadan and Channel Islands:
Spectrum & Safari) xv + 310 pp.
1990 Modern Nigeria (editor) Lagos: Modelor.
1989 History of Nigeria, Vol 1, Nigeria Before 1800 (co author;
text-book) Lagos: Longman.
1989 Politics and Economy in Ibadan, 1893-1945. Lagos, Modelor.
1988 Obafemi Awolowo: The End of an Era? (co-editor) Ile-Ife: University
of Ife Press.
1988 Nigeria and the International Capitalist System (co editor)
Colorado University in collaboration with Lynne Rienner.
1987 Britain and Nigeria: Exploitation or Development? (editor) London:
Zed Press
1987 A History of West Africa (text-book) Lagos: Paico.
1986 Transport Systems in Nigeria (co editor) Syracuse: Maxwell School
of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Foreign and Comparative Studies
Program, African Series XLII.
1986 Nigeria: Peoples, States And Culture (co editor) Lagos: John West.
1986.
1985 The Rise and Fall of Nigeria's Second Republic,1979- 1984 (co
author) London: Zed Press.
1984 The Military in Nineteenth Century Yoruba Politics (co author)
Ile-Ife: University of Ife Press.
1984 The Political Economy of A Pre-colonial African State: Ibadan,1830
- 1900. Ile - Ife: University of Ife Press.
1983 Summary of West African History (text-book; co-author) Ile -Ife:
University of Ife Press.
1983 Islam and Christianity in West Africa (text-book; co-author)
Ile-Ife: University of Ife Press.
ESSAYS (published as pamphlets)
Education and Trans-Atlantic Connections: The U.S. Side (Ondo, Adeyemi
College of Education, 2006).
Globalization and World Politics (Abeokuta, Federal College of Education
2006).
Nationalizing Africa, Culturalizing the West, and Reformulating the
Humanities in Africa (Ile-Ife: Obafemi Awolowo University, 2006).
Africa in World Politics (Akungba-Akoko: Adekunle Ajasin University,
2006).
CHAPTERS IN BOOKS
2006 “Introduction,” in Traditional and Modern Health Systems in Nigeria
(co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2006)
2006 Endangered Bodies: Women, Children and Health in Africa (co-edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2006) pp. xii + 291.
2006 “Writing and Teaching National History in Africa”, in Chantal
Chanson-Jabeur et Odile Goerg, eds., Mama Africa: Hommage a
Coquery-Vidrovitch (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2006), pp. 37-56.
2005 “Footprints of the Ancestors,” of in Wm. Roger Louis, ed., Burnt
Orange Britannia, (London: I. B. Tauris, 2005), pp. 608-623
2005 Igbo Art and Culture and Other Essays by Simon Ottenberg (edited)
(Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005,) pp. 1-12.
2005 “Introduction,” (co-author) in Myth, History and Society: The
Collected Works of Adiele Afigbo (edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World
Press, 2005,) pp. 1-19.
2005 “Introduction,” in Orisa: Yoruba Gods and Spiritual Identity in
Africa and the Diaspora (co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press,
2005,) pp. 1-19.
2005 “Introduction”, in Igbo History and Society: The Essays of Adiele
Afigbo (edited) (Trenton,
NJ: Africa World Press, 2005).
2005 “Introduction,” in Christianity and Social Change in Africa: Essays
in Honor of J. D. Y. Peel (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2005),
pp. 1-25
2005 “Nigeria: The Past in the Present,” in Max Paul Friedman and
Padraic Kenney, eds., Partisan Histories: The Past in Contemporary
Global Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 145-164.
2005 “Mission and Colonial Documents,” in John Edward Philips, ed.,
Writing African History (Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press,
2005), pp. 266-283.
2005 “”The Yoruba Diaspora in the Atlantic World: Methodology and
Research” (co-author) in Falola and Matt Childs, eds., The Yoruba
Diaspora in the Atlantic World (Indiana, Bloomington and Indianapolis:
Indiana University Press, 2004), pp. 1-14.
2005 “Refugees of the Past, Migrants of the Future” in E. Ike Udogu,
ed., Nigeria in the Twenty-first Century, (Trenton, NJ: Africa World
Press, 2005), pp. 207-228.
2005 “Urban Cultures: Relevance and Context” in Urbanization and African
Cultures (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2005), pp. 3-16.
2005 “Afigbo’s Nigeria,” Nigerian History, Politics and Affairs: The
Collected Essays of Adiele Afigbo (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press,
2005), pp. 1-14.
2005 “Introduction” in Yoruba Creativity: Fiction, Language, Life and
Songs (co-author) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press, 2005), 1-7.
2005 “’Great Wings Beating Still’: Africa and the Colonial Legacy” in
Dark Webs: Perspectives on Colonialism in Africa (edited) (Durham:
Carolina Academic Press, 2003), pp. 3-22.
2004 “Ethnicity and Nigeria Politics,: The Past in the Yoruba Present”
in Bruce Berman, Dickson Eyoh and Will Kylicka, eds., Ethnicity and
Democracy in Africa (Oxford and Athens: James Currey and Ohio University
Press, 2004), 148-165.
2004 “Introduction,” (co-author) Africa in the Twentieth Century: The
Adu Boahen Reader (edited) (Trenton, N.J: Africa World Press, 2004).
2004 “An overview,” in Globalization and Urbanization in Africa (coedited)
(Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press, 2004), 1-6.
2004, “Introduction”, Martin R. Delany, The Condition, Elevation,
Emigration, And Destiny of The Colored People of The United States and
Official Report of the Niger Valley Exploring Party (New York: Humanity
Books, 2004), 7-25.
2004, “Iron Smelting and Jewelry Making,” (joint essay) in Nike S. Lawal,
Mathew N. O. Sadiku and P. Ade Dopamu, eds., Understanding Yoruba Life
and Culture (Trenton, NJ.: Africa World Press, 2004), 361-376.
2004 “Introduction” in Teen Life in Africa (edited) (Westport, CT.:
Greenwood, 2004), 1-9.
2003 Introduction,” Sources and Methods in African History: Spoken,
Written, Unearthed (co-author) cited above.
2003 “Adu Boahen: An Introduction” 2003 Ghana in Africa and the World:
Essays in Honor of Adu Boahen (Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press, 2003),
pp. 3-18.
2003 “Introduction,” Africa, Vol. 5, Africa: Contemporary Africa, cited
above.
2002 “Nationalism and African Historiography,” in Q. Edward Wang and
Georg G. Iggers, eds., Turning Points in Historiography: A
Cross-Cultural Analysis (Rochester: University of Rochester Press), pp.
209-236.
2002 “Yoruba Writers and the Construction of Heroes” in Falola and
Barbara Harlow, eds., African Writers and Their Readers: Essays in Honor
of Bernth Lindfors, Vol. II (co-edited) (Trenton, NJ: Africa World
Press, 2002), pp. 27-54.
2002 “Introduction,” in Toyin Falola, ed., Colonial Africa, 1885-1939
(Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2002).
2002 “Yoruba Town Histories,” in Axel Harneit-Sievers, ed., A Place in
the World: New Local Historiographies from Africa and South-Asia
(Leiden: Brill, 2002), pp. 65-86.
2001 “Elite Networking: Traditional Chiefs in Modern Nigeria,” in
Laurence Marfaing and Brigitte Reinwald, eds., African Networks,
Exchange and Spatial Dynamics (Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2001), pp. 269-280.
2000 Section overviews, in Falola, ed., Africa, vol. 1: Peoples and
States (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2000),
2000 “Introduction” in Falola, ed., Africa, vol. 2: Cultures and
Societies (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2000), pp. xx + 332
2000 “Intergroup Relations,” in Falola, Africa, Vol. 2, pp. 19-34.
2000 “Islam” (co-author) in Falola, ed., Africa, Vol. 2, pp. 107-128.
2000 “Agriculture, Trade and Industries,” in Falola, ed., Africa, Vol.
2, pp. 161-176.
1999 “West Africa,” Robin W. Winks, ed., Historiography [The Oxford
History of the British Empire] (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999),
chapter 31.
1999 “West Africa” in Judith M. Brown and Wm. Roger Louis, eds., The
Twentieth Century [The Oxford History of the British Empire] {co-author}
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), chapter 22.
1999 “British Imperialism: Roger Louis and the West African Case,” in
Robert D. King and Robin Kilson, eds., The Statecraft of British
Imperialism: Essays in Honour of Wm. Roger Louis (London: Frank Cass,
1999), pp.124-142.
1998 “Patriarchy, Patronage, and Power: Corruption in Nigeria,”
(co-author) in John Mukum Mbaku, ed., Corruption and the Crisis of
Institutional Reforms in Africa (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press,
1998), pp. 167-192.
1998 “Corruption in the Nigerian Public Service, 1945-1960,” in John
Mukum Mbaku, ed., Corruption and the Crisis of Institutional Reforms in
Africa (Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1998), pp.137-166.
1997, "Christian Radicalism and Nigerian Politics" in Paul A. Beckett
and Crawford Young, eds., Dilemmas of Democracy in Nigeria. (University
of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY 1997), pp.265-282.
1997 Contributions on Africa in William Travis Hanes III, ed., World
History: Continuity and Change (Austin: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
1997).
1997 “Sustainable Development and Peace in Africa,” in A. R. Maglhas,
ed., Sustainable Development: Implications for World Peace (Austin: L.
B. J. School of Public Affairs, 1997), pp. 103-8.
1996 "Interpreting Oral Traditions as historical Source and the Use of
Models: an assessment of Jan Vansina" in E. Alagoa, ed., Oral History in
Africa and the Diaspora (Lagos: CBACC), chapter 12 (co- author).
1996 “African Studies in a Changing World Order,” in M. Anda, ed.,
Africa in the New World Order (Little Rock: DCI, 1996), pp. 7-22.
1996 “Wunschenswert, aber von geringem Nutzen,”(co-author) der uberblick,
2, pp. 46-48.
1996 "The Imperial Experience: Africa," in P. J. Marshall, ed., British
Empire (Cambridge: C.U.P., 1996), chapter 14.
1996 "Africa in Perspective" in Stephen Ellis, ed., Africa Now: People,
Policies and Institutions. (London: James Currey and Heinemann), 1996,
pp. 3-19.
1996 “Mining and Extractive Industries in the Nineteenth Century,”
(co-author) in G. O. Ogunremi and E. K. Faluyi, eds., An Economic
History of West Africa Since 1750 (Ibadan: Rex Charles in association
with Connel Publications, 1996), pp.49-60.
1996 “Trade and Markets in Pre-colonial Economy,” Ogunremi and Faluyi,
eds., An Economic History of West Africa Since 1750, pp. 61-71.
1996 “Trade with Europeans in the Nineteenth Century,” G. O. Ogunremi
and E. K. Faluyi, eds., An Economic History of West Africa Since 1750,
pp 98-111.
1996 “Economic Cooperation: The ECOWAS Example,” (co-author) in G. O.
Ogunremi and E. K. Faluyi, eds., An Economic History of West Africa
Since 1750, pp. 246-256.
1996 “Post-independence Economic Changes and Development in West
Africa,” (co-author) in G. O. Ogunremi and E. K. Faluyi, eds., An
Economic History of West Africa Since 1750, pp. 257-271.
1995 "Early African History" (With John Lamphear) in Martin, P., ed.,
Africa (Indiana: Indiana University Press).
1995 “Gender, Business, and Space Control: Yoruba Market Women and
Power,” in Bessie House-Midamba and Felix K. Ekechi, eds., African
Market and Economic Power: The Role of Women in African Economic
Development (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1995), pp. 23-40.
1995 “Money and Informal Credit Institutions in Colonial Western
Nigeria” in Jane I. Guyer, ed., Money Matters. Instability, Values and
Social Payments in the Modern History of West African Communities
(Portsmouth: Heinemann & London: James Currey), pp. 162-187.
1994, “Macht, Status und Einflub von Yoruba-Chiefs in historischer
Perspektive” in Periplus 1994. (Dieckstrabem Munster, 1994), pp. 51-67.
1994 "Pawnship in Colonial Southwestern Nigeria" in Pawnship in Africa,
pp. 245-266.
1994 "Pawnship in Historical Perspective" (co-author) in Pawnship in
Africa, pp. 1-26.
1994 "Slavery and Pawnship in the Yoruba Economy of the Nineteenth
Century," in Paul Lovejoy and Nicholas Roger, eds., Unfree Labour in the
Development of the Atlantic World. Essex: (London: Frank Cass), 1994,
pp. 221-245.
1994 "Child Health in Social and Historical Perspective," in Child
Health, op.cit. (co-author), chapter one.
1994 "Introduction" in Child Health, op.cit.
1993 "Ade Ajayi on Samuel Johnson: Filling the Gaps," in Falola, ed.,
African Historiography, chapter 7.
1993 "Introduction," in Falola, ed., Pioneer, Patriot and Patriarch.
1992 "Ijebu-Ibadan Trade Relations In An Era of Warfare," in Falola and
Law, eds., Warfare and Diplomacy, Chapter 3.
1992 "The Lebanese in West Africa" in J. F. Ade Ajayi J. D. Y. Peel,
eds., Empires and Peoples in African History: Essays in Memory of
Michael Crowder (London: Longman), pp. 121-141.
1992 "Introduction," to Health in Africa in Falola and Ityavyar, eds.,
Political Economy of Health.
1991 “Introduction,” in Yoruba Historiography , pp. 1-4.
1991 “The Yoruba Wars of the Nineteenth Century,” in Yoruba
Historiography, pp. 123-134.
1991 "Politicians and the economy," in S. Gbadegesin, ed., The
Politicization of Society During Nigeria's Second Republic,1979-1983
(New York: Edwin Mellen), pp. 13-50 (co- author).
1991 "Religion and Economy," (co-author) in Olupona and Falola, eds.,
Religion and Society in Nigeria.
1990 "The Impact of the Nineteenth-century Sokoto Jihad on Yorubaland,"
in A. M. Kani & K. A. Gandi, eds., State and Society in the Sokoto
Caliphate (Sokoto: Usmanu Danfodio University) pp. 126-141.
1990 "Not Just A Currency: The Cowrie in Nigerian Culture" in David
Henige and T. C. McCaskie, eds., West African Economic and Social
History: Studies in Memory of Marion Johnson (Wisconsin-Madison: African
Studies), (co- author), pp. 29-36.
1989 "The Evolution and Changes in Nigerian Federalism," in R. Olaniyan,
ed., Federalism in a Changing World (Lagos: Ministry of Special Duties
and the Obafemi Awolowo University Press), pp. 50-77.
1989 "Leadership in Nigeria: Reflections of a Follower," in Falola, ed.,
Modern Nigeria, pp. 159-173.
1989 "Olusanya on Modern Nigeria: A synthesis" in Falola, ed., Modern
Nigeria, op. cit. , pp.1-16.
1989 "The Cities" in Y. B. Usman, ed., Nigeria Since Independence: The
Society (Ibadan: Heinemann), pp. 213-249.
1988 "Shagari: Oil and Foreign Policy in the Second Republic" in Falola,
ed., Nigeria..System , pp. 103-120 (co-author).
1988 "The economy, the civil war, and Nigeria's foreign policy" in
Falola, Nigeria...System , (co-author), pp.35-56
1988 "Domestic Economy and Foreign Policy," in Nigeria and the
International Capitalist System,. op.cit., pp. 1-14 (editors'
introduction)
1988 "Trade as a Factor of Inter-State relations in Africa" in A.
Asiwaju et. al., eds., African Unity: the Cultural Foundation (Lagos:
CBACC), pp. 89-100.
1988 "The Context: The Political Economy of Colonial Nigeria" in Falola
et al , eds., Obafemi Awolowo, pp. 19-63 (co-author).
1988 "Earliest Yoruba Authors" in Yemi Ogunbiyi, ed., Perspectives on
Nigerian Literature:1700 to the Present (Lagos: Guardian Books), 22-32.
1987 "The Illusion of Economic Development," in Falola, ed., Nigeria and
Britain , (co-author), pp. 200-222.
1987 "Production for the Metropolis: the Extractive Industries" in
Falola, Nigeria and Britain, (co-author), pp. 91-13.
1987 "Production for the Metropolis: Agriculture and Forest Products" in
Falola, ed., Nigeria and Britain , pp. 80-90.
1987 "Introduction: Colonialism and Exploitation," in Falola, ed.,
Nigeria and Britain, op.cit. (co-author), pp. 1-31.
1987 "Development through integration: the politics and problems of
ECOWAS," in O. Akinrinade and J. K. Barling, eds., Economic Development
in Africa: International Efforts, Issues and Prospects (co-author),
(London: Pinter), pp. 52-76.
1986 "Conclusion," by editors in Falola, Transport .
1986 "Traditional, Non-mechanical Transport Systems" (co-author) in
Falola, Transport, pp.17-30.
1986 "Introduction" by editors, in Falola and Olanrewaju, eds.,
Transport Systems, op.cit
1986 "Economy" in Nigeria , pp.326-339 (co-author).
1986 "Inter-group Relations" in Nigeria pp.177-193 (co-author).
1986 "The Kanem-Borno Empire," in Falola, ed., Nigeria, op.cit.. pp. 57-
75.
1986 "The Sources of Nigerian History" in Falola, ed. Nigeria: Peoples,
States and Culture , op.cit., pp. 3-22.
1986 "Berlin and Afro-European Relations," in S. Ahmadu, ed., Africa and
Europe (London: Croom Helm), chap. 2 (co-author).
1986 "Prelude to the Partition of Africa," in S. Ahmadu, ed., Africa and
Europe: From Partition to Interdependence And Dependence? (London: Croom
Helm), chapter one (co-author).
1985 "Nigeria's Indigenous Science and Technology Over Time: an
Exploratory Essay into its Components, Transformation and Abortion," in
Folklore and National Development, Ile-Ife, pp. 181-200.
1985 "The Political System of Ibadan in the Nineteenth century," in J.
F. Ade Ajayi and B.Ikara, eds., Evolution of Political Culture in
Nigeria (Ibadan: University Press Ltd. (formerly Oxford University
Press), pp. 104-117.
1985 "The role of traditional rulers in society: a case study of Yoruba
Oba and Chiefs," in O.Aborisade, ed., Local Government and the
Traditional Rulers in Nigeria (Ile-Ife: University of Ife Press),
(co-author), pp. 3-19.
1985 "Pre-colonial Nigeria: Socio-political Development North of the
Niger-Benue," in R. Olaniyan, ed., Nigerian History and Culture (London:
Longman), (co-author), pp. 56-96
1985 "Nigeria's Indigenous Economy," in R. Olaniyan, ed., Nigerian
History and Culture (London: Longman), pp. 97-112.
1983 "The Socio-economic realities and Political situation in Nigeria,"
in M. A. Oduyoye, ed.,The State of Christian Theology in Nigeria
(Ibadan: Daystar).
1982 "Social and Economic Development in Contemporary Africa,” in R.
Olaniyan, ed., African History and Culture (London: Longman),
pp.111-126.
ARTICLES IN JOURNALS
2006 “A Trajet�ria de um intellectual Africano,” Tempo: Revista do
Departamento de Historia da UFF, 177-186.
2007 “Global Explanations Versus Local Interpretations: The
Historiography of the Influenza Pandemic of 1918-19 in Africa,”
(co-author) History in Africa, 33, 2006, pp. 205-230.
2006 “The works of A. E. Afigbo on Nigeria: An Historiographical Essay,”
(co-author) History in Africa, 33, 2006, pp. 155-178.
2005 “Writing and Teaching National History in Africa in an Era of
Global History,” Africa Spectrum, 40, 3, 2005, pp. 499-519.
2005 “Africa’s Media Empire: Drum’s Expansion To Nigeria,” (co-author),
History in Africa, 32, 2005, pp. 133-164.
2003 “Oil in Nigeria: A Bibliographical Reconnaissance,” (co-author)
History in Africa, 30, 2003, pp. 133-156.
1999 “Religious Entrepreneurship and the Informal Economic Sector: Orisa
Worship as “Service Provider” in Nigeria and the United States,”
(co-author), Paideuma, 45, 1999, pp. 115-135.
1999 “British Imperialism: Roger Louis and the West African Case,” The
Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 27, 2, May 1999, pp.
124-142. Also in Robert D. King and Robin Kilson, eds., The Statecraft
of British Imperialism: Essays in Honour of Wm. Roger Louis (London:
Frank Cass, 1999), pp.124-142.
1998 “The End of Slavery among the Yoruba,” Slavery and Abolition: A
Journal of Slave and Post-Slave Studies, 19, 2, 1998, pp. 232-249.
[Reprinted in S. Miers and M.A. Klein, eds., Slavery and Colonial Rule
in Africa, London: Cass, 1998]
1997 ‘“Manufacturing Trouble”: Currency Forgery in Colonial Southwestern
Nigeria,’ Journal of African Economic History, 25, 1997, pp. 121-147.
1997 “Yoruba Writers and the Construction of Heroes,” History in Africa,
24, 1997, pp. 157-175.
1997 “Nigeria in the Global Context of Refugees: Historical and
Comparative Perspectives,” Journal of Asian and African Studies, XXXII,
Nos. 1-2, June 1997, pp. 5-21. Essay also appears in P. E. Lovejoy and
Pat A. T. Williams, eds., Displacement and the Politics of Violence in
Nigeria. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997, pp. 5-21.
1996 “Chiefs, Boundaries, and Sacred Woodlands: Early Nationalism and
the Defeat of Colonial Conservationism in the Gold Coast and Nigeria,
1870-1916,” (co-author), African Economic History, 24, 1996, pp. 1-23.
1996 “Swahili Women since the 19th century: Theoretical and Empirical
Considerations on Gender and Identity Construction,” (co-author),Africa
Today, Vol. 43, Number 3, July-Sept. 1996, pp. 251-268.
1996 "Brigandage and Piracy in 19th century Yorubaland," Journal of the
Historical Society of Nigeria. Nos. 1 & 2, Vol. XIII, Dec. 1985-June
1986, pp. 83-106 (essay was printed in 1996).
1995 "T. O. Avoshe on the History of Epe and its Environs," History in
Africa, 22, 1995, pp. 165-195.
1995 "Theft in Colonial Southwestern Nigeria," Africa Rivista trimstrale
di Studie e documentazione dell'Instituto Italo-Africano, Anno L-N.1,
Marzo 1995, pp. 1-24.
1994 “Slavery and Pawnship in the Yoruba Economy of the Nineteenth
Century,” Slavery and Abolition: A Journal of Slave and Post-Slave
Studies, 15, 2, 1994, pp. 221-245.
1994 "The Scholarship of Jacob Egharevba of Benin," (with Uyo Usanlele)
History in Africa, 21, 1994, pp. 308-318.
1993 "'My Friend the Shylock': Money-Lenders and their Clients in
South-Western Nigeria," Journal of African History, 34,3, 1993, pp.
403-424.
1993 "'Alternative History': The World of Yoruba Chroniclers," Passages,
4,1, 1993.
1993 "The Documentation of Ilorin By Samuel Ojo Bada" (with H. O.
Danmole), History in Africa, 20, pp. 1-13.
1992 "Salt is gold: the management of salt scarcity in Nigeria during
the Second World War," Canadian Journal of African Studies, 26, 3, 1992,
pp. 412-436.
1992 "The Ibadan Elite and the Search for Political Order, 1893- 1939,"
Africa: Rivista trimestrale di studi e documentazione dell'Instituto
Italo-Africano, XLVII, 3, September, 1992.
1992 "An Ounce Is Enough: The Gold Industry and the Politics of Control
in Colonial Southwestern Nigeria," African Economic History, 20, 1992,
pp. 27-50.
1992 "The Instability of the Naira and Social Payments among the
Yoruba," Journal of African and Asian History (co-author), XXVII,3-4,
pp. 216-228.
1992 "Thirty Years of African Research and Publication," Geneve-Afrique,
XXX, 2, 1992, pp.193-7.
1992 "The Minor Works of T. Ola Avoseh," History in Africa, 19, pp.
237-62.
1992 "Pre-colonial African Economy," Tarikh, Vol. 10, pp. 7-20.
1991 "The Construction and Destruction of the Ijaye Economy," Afrika und
Ubersee, 74, 2, 1991, pp. 21-37.
1991 "Yoruba Caravan System in the 19th century," The International
Journal of African Historical Studies, 24,1,1991, pp. 111-132.
1991 "Kemi Morgan and the Second Reconstruction of Ibadan History,"
History in Africa , 18,1991, pp. 93-112.
1989/90 (article appeared in 1992) "Pre-Colonial Origins of The National
Question In Nigeria: Yoruba origins of the National Question in
Nigeria," Africa: Revista do Centro de Estudos Africanos, 12-13, 1, pp.
3-24.
1990 "Lebanese traders in southwestern Nigeria," African Affairs, Vol.
89, October 1990, pp. 523-553.
1989 "Iwe Itan Oyo: A Traditional Yoruba History and its Author,"
Journal of African History, 30, pp. 301-329 (co-author).
1989 "Cassava Starch For Export in Nigeria During the Second World
War," Journal of African Economic History,18:1989, pp. 73-98.
1989 "The Yoruba Toll System," Journal of African History,30:1, pp.
41-63.
1988 "The ideas and political thought of Frantz Fanon," Nigerian
Forum:Journal of the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs, 8:9 &
10, pp. 221-231. (co-author).
1988 "A Research Agenda on the Yoruba in the nineteenth century,"
History in Africa:Journal of Methods 15, pp. 211-227.
1988 "The spread of Islam and Christianity and its Impact on Religious
Pluralism in Africa," Dialogue And Alliance, pp. 1-18.
1987 "Power Relations and Social Interactions among Ibadan
Slaves,1850-1900," African Economic History, 16, pp. 95-114.
1987 "The Ijaye in Diaspora,1862-1895:Problems of Integration and
Re-settlement," Journal of African and Asian Studies, XXII:1&2, pp.
67-79.
1987 "Refugees in Yorubaland in the Nineteenth century," Asian and
African Studies, 21:2, pp. 165-185 (co-author).
1987 "The Economic Foundation of Pre-colonial Ife Society With
Particular Reference to the Nineteenth century," Yoruba:Journal of the
Yoruba Studies Association of Nigeria, New Series, 1, pp. 1-24.
1986 "Missionaries and Domestic Slavery in Yorubaland in the nineteenth
century," The Journal of Religious History, 14: 2, pp. 181-192.
1986 "Power and Wealth in Kurunmi's Ijaye,1831-1862," African Studies,
10, pp. 75-85 (co-author).
1985 "Technology Transfer To The Third World: Obscurantism, Myth and
Social Implications," The Journal of General Studies, 5 & 6, 181-192
(co-author).
1985 "Nigerian-Japan Trade relations," Ikenga: Journal of African
Studies,7:1 & 2, pp. 3-45 (co-author).
1985 "The Content of History Education in Nigerian Universities and
Colleges of Education," Trans-African Journal of History 14, pp. 112-123
(co-author).
1985 "Ibadan-Ilorin Relations in the Nineteenth century: A study in
imperial struggles in Yorubaland," Trans-African Journal of History, 14,
pp. 21-36 (co-author).
1985 "Migrant Settlers in Ife Society,1830-1960," The Calabar Historical
Journal, 3:1, pp. 18-35.
1985 "The Ibadan Conference of 1855: Diplomacy and Conflict Resolution
in mid-nineteenth century Yorubaland," Geneve-Afrique, 2, pp. 30-56.
1985 "Church, Politics and Society in Ibadan in the Nineteenth century,"
The Journal of Religious History, 1, pp. 295-305.
1985 "From Hospitality to Hostility: Ibadan and Strangers,1830-1904,"
The Journal of African History, 26, pp. 51-68.
1984 "Prostitution in Ibadan,1895-1950," The Journal of Business and
Social Studies, New Series, 6: 2, pp. 40-54.
1984 "Hegemony, Neo-colonialism and Political Instability in
Contemporary Nigeria," The African Review: A Journal of African
Politics,Development and International Affairs, 11:2, pp. 41-62
(co-author).
1983 "Post-war Political Changes in Ibadan, 1893-1913," ODU, 24, pp.
61-77.
1983 "Ilesa Palace Officials in Pre-colonial Times," Essays In History,
1, pp. 2-11.
1983 "Amilcar Cabral on African Economic Development," Lusophone Areas
Studies Journal, No. 2, pp. 64-72.
1982 "A Critique of the Rev. Samuel Johnson's Contribution to the Study
of Yoruba history," The African Historian, Vol. ix, 1982.
1982 "The Recycling of Oil Rents and Nigeria's Peripheral Role in the
World Capitalist System," Ife Social Sciences Review, 5:1 & 2, pp.
24-45; (co-author).
1982 "On the Place of Social and Economic Studies in Pre-colonial
Nigerian history," Journal of General Studies, 2, pp. 67-73.
1982 "Colonialism and Exploitation," Lusophone Areas Studies Journal ,
1:1, pp. 41-62.
1982 "Religion, Rituals and Yoruba Pre-colonial Domestic Economy,"
Journal of Religions, 2, pp. 27-38.
1982 "The foreign policy of Ibadan in the nineteenth century," ODU, 22,
Jan.-July, pp. 91-108.
1981 "Power Drift in the Political System of Southwestern Nigeria in the
Nineteenth century," ODU:A Journal of West African Studies, 21,
Jan.-July, pp. 109-127.
1981 "The Dynamics of Anglo-Ibadan Relations in the in the Nineteenth
Century," ODU , No. 21, January-July, pp. 128-148.
1981 "The teaching of Islamic History in Nigerian Schools," Islam and
the Modern Age: Quarterly Journal, XII:14. Article reprinted in Ife
Educator, Vol. xii, No.1, 1981.
1981 "Yoruba Historiography," Ikenga: Journal of the Institute of
African Studies, University of Nigeria, 5:1, pp. 83-90.
1981 "Trends in Nigerian Historiography," Trans-African Journal of
History, 1: 2, pp. 97-112.
Return to Table of Contents
- Olayemi Akinwumi
- Olayemi Akinwumi is a professor at the
University of Ilorin, Nigeria, West Africa. He just published a
biography on the Aku Of Wukari, a descendant of Kwararafa Kingdom.
He served as a Visiting Scholar at the Institut fur Ethnologie,
Freie Universitat Berlin.
- Zenebworke Bissrat
- Zenebworke Bissrat served for several
years as Senior Management Expert at the Ethiopian Management
Institute, Addis Ababa. She is at present associated with the CMRS,
Ethiopian Catholic Church, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
- Paulus Gerdes
- Paulus Gerdes is the Rector of
Mozambique's Universidade Pedagogoco Maputo, Mozambique. He has
extensive publications on African mathematics and is the Chair of
the Commission on the History of Mathematics in Africa.
- Mosebjane Malatsi
- Mosebjane Malatsi is a Senior Policy
Analyst at the Development Bank of Southern Africa, based in
Johannesburg. He is a leading member of the Pan-African Congress.
- Alfred Zack-Williams
- Alfred Zack-Williams is from Sierra Leone.
He is a professor of Sociology and he teaches in the Department of
Historical and Critical Studies at the University of Central
Lancaster, UK. He is also a member of the Editorial Board of the
Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE), United Kingdom.
-
|
|
|